Saturday, May 26, 2007

Beyond Stupid



Illinois


'Stupid'

Adjective

1. Lacking mental and physical alertness and activity: hebetudinous, lethargic,sluggish, stuporous, torpid.


The following is the text of the amended Illinois Horse Meat Act which was signed into Law on Thursday, May 24, 2007. Why is this statute stupid? Let me spell it out. This statute prohibits the slaughter of horses and their cousins in the state of Illinois for human consumption. This statute does not prohibit the slaughter of horses and their cousins for consumption by carnivores in zoos.

Essentially, Cavel International will still slaughter horses as they will not be in violation of the new law as long as the horse meat is used to feed lions, and tigers, and bears. It is unclear how much of a demand exists for horse meat at zoos, however, it is believed to be small. Furthermore, there is a very active educational campaign for zookeepers regarding feeding horse meat to their carnivores.


The tragedy is that if the 'and for other purposes' clause had been included, no equids would be allowed to be slaughtered for any reason in Illinois. One equid slaughtered for zoo food is one too many. Someone committed an enormous, unforgivable, egregious error when drafting the legislation. It is almost as if they didn't want horse slaughter to ever end.

Of course, Cavel is suing. The Chicago Tribune reports that:

Owner of DeKalb horse slaughterhouse sues over state ban
Published May 26, 2007

Cavel International Inc., a Belgium-based company that operates a horse slaughterhouse in DeKalb, filed suit Friday in federal court seeking to nullify a state law that closed down the plant.

The law, signed Thursday by Gov. Rod Blagojevich, prohibits the import, export, possession and slaughter of horses intended for human consumption.

Cavel's suit argues the law is an unconstitutional exercise of the state's police power because it does not protect any legitimate health or safety interest.

The suit seeks a temporary restraining order that would allow the plant to continue operating while the suit is being litigated. [End of Chicago Tribune quote].

These grounds are incredibly weak and it is doubtful that Cavel will have any success beyond racking up huge legal fees.

Here is the statute:


Public Act 095-0002

HB1711 Enrolled
LRB095 07034 RAS 27156 b

AN ACT concerning horses.

Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, represented in the General Assembly:

Section 5. The Illinois Horse Meat Act is amended by adding Section 1.5 as follows:

(225 ILCS 635/1.5 new)

Sec. 1.5. Slaughter for human consumption unlawful.

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it is unlawful for any person to slaughter a horse if that person knows or should know that any of the horse meat will be used for human consumption.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it is unlawful for any person to possess, to import into or export from this State, or to sell, buy, give away, hold, or accept any horse meat if that person knows or should know that the horse meat will be used for human consumption.

(c) Any person who knowingly violates any of the provisions of this Section is guilty of a Class C misdemeanor.

(d) This Section shall not apply to:

(1) Any commonly accepted noncommercial, recreational, or sporting activity.
(2) Any existing laws which relate to horse taxes or zoning.
(3) The processing of food producing animals other than those of the equine genus.

(225 ILCS 635/14 rep.) (from Ch. 56 1/2, par. 253)

Section 7. The Illinois Horse Meat Act is amended by repealing Section 14.

Section 10. The Animals Intended for Food Act is amended by changing Section 2.1 as follows:

(410 ILCS 605/2.1) (from Ch. 8, par. 107.1)

Sec. 2.1. When in the interest of the general public and in the opinion of the Department of Agriculture it is deemed advisable, the Department has authority to quarantine or restrict any and all animals intended for human consumption that contain poisonous or deleterious substances which may render meat or meat products or poultry or poultry products from such animals or poultry injurious to health; except in case the quantity of such substances in such animals does not
ordinarily render meat or meat products or poultry or poultry products from such animals injurious to health.

The Department or its duly authorized agent shall investigate or cause to be investigated all cases where it has reason to believe that animals intended for human consumption are contaminated with any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render them unfit for human consumption.

The Department or its duly designated agent in performing the duties vested in it under this Act is empowered to enter any premises, barns, stables, sheds, or other places for the purposes of administering this Act.

The Department may allow the sale or transfer of animals under quarantine or restriction subject to reasonable rules and regulations as may be prescribed.

For the purposes of this Act, the term "Animal" means cattle, calves, sheep, swine, horses, mules or other equidae, goats, poultry and any other animal which can be or may be used in and for meat or poultry or their products for human consumption.
(Source: P.A. 77-2117.)

Section 15. The Illinois Equine Infectious Anemia Control Act is amended by changing Section 4 as follows:

(510 ILCS 65/4) (from Ch. 8, par. 954)

Sec. 4. Tests of equidae entering the State.

All equidae more than 12 months of age entering the State for any reason other than for immediate slaughter shall be accompanied by a Certificate of Veterinary Inspection issued by an accredited veterinarian of the state of origin within 30 days prior to entry and shall be negative to an official test for EIA within one year prior to entry. Equidae entering the State for immediate slaughter shall be accompanied by a consignment direct to slaughter at an approved equine slaughtering establishment.
(Source: P.A. 86-223.)


Section 20. The Humane Care for Animals Act is amended by changing Sections 5 and 7.5 as follows:

(510 ILCS 70/5) (from Ch. 8, par. 705)

Sec. 5. Lame or disabled horses. No person shall sell, offer to sell, lead, ride, transport, or drive on any public way any equidae which, because of debility, disease, lameness or any other cause, could not be worked in this State without violating this Act, unless the equidae is being sold, transported, or housed with the intent that it will be moved in an expeditious and humane manner to an approved slaughtering establishment. Such equidae may be conveyed to a proper place for medical or surgical treatment or, for humane keeping or euthanasia, or for slaughter in an approved slaughtering establishment.

A person convicted of violating this Section or any rule, regulation, or order of the Department pursuant thereto is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. A second or subsequent violation is a Class 4 felony.
(Source: P.A. 92-650, eff. 7-11-02.)

(510 ILCS 70/7.5)

Sec. 7.5. Downed animals.

(a) For the purpose of this Section a downed animal is one incapable of walking without assistance.

(b) No downed animal shall be sent to a stockyard, auction, or other facility where its impaired mobility may result in suffering. An injured animal other than those of the equine genus may be sent directly to a slaughter facility.

(c) A downed animal sent to a stockyard, auction, or other facility in violation of this Section shall be humanely euthanized, the disposition of such animal shall be the responsibility of the owner, and the owner shall be liable for any expense incurred.

If an animal becomes downed in transit it shall be the responsibility of the carrier.

(d) A downed animal shall not be transported unless individually segregated.

(e) A person convicted of violating this Section or any rule, regulation, or order of the Department pursuant thereto is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor. A second or subsequent violation is a Class 4 felony, with every day that a violation continues constituting a separate offense.
(Source: P.A. 92-650, eff. 7-11-02.)

Section 25. The Humane Slaughter of Livestock Act is amended by changing Section 2 as follows:

(510 ILCS 75/2) (from Ch. 8, par. 229.52)

Sec. 2. As used in this Act:

(1) "Director" means the Director of the Department of Agriculture of the State of Illinois.

(2) "Person" means any individual, partnership, corporation, or association doing business in this State, in whole or in part.

(3) "Slaughterer" means any person regularly engaged in the commercial slaughtering of livestock.

(4) "Livestock" means cattle, calves, sheep, swine, horses, mules, goats, and any other animal which can or may be used in and for the preparation of meat or meat products for consumption by human beings or animals.

"Livestock", however, does not include horses, mules, or other equidae to be used in and for the preparation of meat or meat products for consumption by human beings, which is prohibited under Section 1.5 of the Illinois Horse Meat Act.

(5) "Packer" means any person engaged in the business of slaughtering or manufacturing or otherwise preparing meat or meat products for sale, either by such person or others; or of manufacturing or preparing livestock products for sale by such person or others.

(6) "Humane method" means either (a) a method whereby the animal is rendered insensible to pain by gunshot or by mechanical, electrical, chemical or other means that is rapid and effective, before being shackled, hoisted, thrown, cast or cut; or (b) a method in accordance with ritual requirements of the Jewish faith or any other religious faith whereby the animal suffers loss of consciousness by anemia of the brain caused by the simultaneous and instantaneous severance of the carotid arteries with a sharp instrument.
(Source: Laws 1967, p. 2023.)

Section 97. Severability. The provisions of this Act are severable under Section 1.31 of the Statute on Statutes.

Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon becoming law.

According to Sec. 2. As used in this Act:

(6) "Humane method" means either (a) a method whereby the animal is rendered insensible to pain by gunshot or by mechanical, electrical, chemical or other means that is rapid and effective, before being shackled, hoisted, thrown, cast or cut; or (b) a method in accordance with ritual requirements of the Jewish faith or any other religious faith whereby the animal suffers loss of consciousness by anemia of the brain caused by the simultaneous and instantaneous severance of the carotid arteries with a sharp instrument.
(Source: Laws 1967, p. 2023.)

This means that equids intended for carnivore consumption will experience the pain and terror of being slaughtered by the use the penetrating captive bolt. Analysis of the Humane Slaughter Act of 1958, amended in 2002, reveals that the use of the penetrating captive bolt is beyond inhumane; it is illegal according to the definitions of the statute.

The Illinois Horse Meat Act does not protect equids bound for carnivore consumption. The state of Illinois invites equids to be slaughtered for carnivore consumption. This statute fails as some equids are still legally eligible to be slaughtered.

'The Jungle'

What an incredibly well researched statute. The author(s) of the Illinois Horse Meat Act are beyond stupid. They are completely incompetent and had absolutely no business drafting a horse protection bill at all. They should have read 'The Jungle' by Upton Sinclair to learn about the true horror of all slaughter. 'Cliff Notes' are available. I recommend investing in at least a copy of those.

Ellen-Cathryn Nash
President
Manes & Tails Organization


Friday, May 18, 2007

'The Big Debate'






The Big Debate


Recently The Horse presented a poll regarding horse slaughter. As a mouthpiece for the completely pro slaughter AAEP the poll was attempting to prove that the majority of respondents were pro slaughter. The question posed was 'Do you support or oppose a federal ban on horse slaughter?'

When they discovered that respondents were overwhelmingly anti slaughter, they created a follow up poll. This follow up was not even close to a Gallop poll by any stretch of the imagination. It was laughable with its imprecision, clearly begging their question, and ignoring significant facts about anti slaughter horse lovers.

The second poll asked if respondents could rescue a horse or horses, how many, and also required the email address, physical address and telephone number of the respondents.

The poll was completely skewed as many people who are anti slaughter are not horse owners, nor do they have any involvement in the horse industry beyond watching the Triple Crown races. The Horse proved absolutely nothing with the results of the follow up poll.

Here are the results of the 'Do you support or oppose a federal ban on horse slaughter? poll:

Do you support or oppose a federal ban on horse slaughter?


I oppose slaughter in every circumstance. 51.93% (2818)

I oppose slaughter for human consumption. 5.69% (309)

I support slaughter for humane euthanasia only. 14.78% (802)

I support owners' rights to choose slaughter for any reason. 27.60% (1498)


Total Votes: 5427


The State of Illinois passed a law banning horse slaughter in their state, as did the state of Texas. This means that at least three slaughter houses are closed. Dallas Crown is allegedly slaughtering horses for zoo food for carnivores. This is not against the Texas law. There is also Bravo Packing located in New Jersey and their killer buyers frequent the Camelot Auction. Bravo also slaughters for zoos. As with Dallas Crown, Bravo is not violating any New Jersey laws when they slaughter for carnivores.

It is imperative that the pending legislation passes as soon as possible. This will prevent the export of American horses to Mexico, Canada, and Japan. It will also force the closure of the 'back yard' slaughterhouses.

If you have yet to contact your two Senators and one Representative, you may find the directory of the 110th Congress here. Please do the following: Call the District office, write a letter, and send a fax. E-mail can be purged and never read.

Ellen-Cathryn Nash
Manes and Tails Organization

The reference for the poll can be found at
The Horse.com

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

What's the Deal with These 'Blacklists'??



Who Appointed a CIA for Horse Rescue Organizations??

Lately, there has been a flurry of 'blacklist' postings on some horse rescue web sites regarding other horse rescue organizations. The rescues doing the blacklisting and the rescues being blacklisted will not be identified here.

To post statements on the web that are untrue is criminal libel which is a felony. The party being libeled may sue the party who has done the libeling. Rather than libel an organization, if you have questions about the quality of care the rescue is providing for their horses and other animals, first call the local authorities, then the ASPCA, the HSUS, or PeTA and ask them to investigate.

It is true, and the IRS will confirm this, that if a rescue organization that does not have a Federal or State 501(c)(3) or similar recognized State status it cannot legally accept donations of any kind. For the State 501(c)(3) organizations you must contact the State Division of Revenue to verify the State status. All rescue organizations, whether Federal or State, must have their EIN posted on their mission statement page.

If your organization has been libeled then you must sue the party that has libeled you. All of this is very counterproductive for the horses and rescues that do an excellent job with their mission of saving and rehabbing horses from slaughter. What has been discovered is there are people who dislike others, so they are reporting them to these web sites who have these blacklists. Some of the organizations with these lists are not valid rescues as they have been denied either the State or Federal status, but they trade as valid rescues. This is illegal.

Receiving dozens of emails in one day regarding someone who has been blacklisted is a waste of bandwidth in more ways than one. If you know the rescue suffering the effects of the Scarlet B, of course you have to defend them. This takes time and there is absolutely no need for this as this should not exist in the first place. 'Blacklists' should be banned regarding rescues. If you know unethical individuals that you have adopted horses to, then post information only about them.

Leave the investigating to the professionals, especially when an organization being accused is not even in the same state as the accuser!!!

Ellen-Cathryn Nash
Founder and President
Manes and Tails Organization
EIN: 90-0182985